<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Aerosteon saga, Part 2: Overinflation and undercitation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/</link>
	<description>SV-POW!  ...  All sauropod vertebrae, all the time!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:30:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogs, papers, etc.: some more random thoughts, from Mike this time &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</title>
		<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/#comment-3167</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs, papers, etc.: some more random thoughts, from Mike this time &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svpow.wordpress.com/?p=471#comment-3167</guid>
		<description>[...] The world of dinosaur palaeontology is probably just as aware of Matt&#8217;s series of Aerosteon response articles here on SV-POW! as it would be if he&#8217;d put those together into a paper that was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The world of dinosaur palaeontology is probably just as aware of Matt&#8217;s series of Aerosteon response articles here on SV-POW! as it would be if he&#8217;d put those together into a paper that was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs, papers, and the brave new digital world: Matt&#8217;s thoughts &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</title>
		<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs, papers, and the brave new digital world: Matt&#8217;s thoughts &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svpow.wordpress.com/?p=471#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>[...] down in the comments. For a more nuanced take on the variety of review options at PLoS ONE, see here.] The only holdup there is that the post-hoc review by commenters is not working out quite like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] down in the comments. For a more nuanced take on the variety of review options at PLoS ONE, see here.] The only holdup there is that the post-hoc review by commenters is not working out quite like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unstated precision and undemonstrated accuracy: two more reasons why we don&#8217;t trust DinoMorph &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</title>
		<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/#comment-2968</link>
		<dc:creator>Unstated precision and undemonstrated accuracy: two more reasons why we don&#8217;t trust DinoMorph &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svpow.wordpress.com/?p=471#comment-2968</guid>
		<description>[...] reference supporting all this is number 20 (remember how much I like numbered references?), and here&#8217;s the full text (Stevens and Parrish 1999: p. 800): 20. J. M. Parrish and K. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reference supporting all this is number 20 (remember how much I like numbered references?), and here&#8217;s the full text (Stevens and Parrish 1999: p. 800): 20. J. M. Parrish and K. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MYDD! &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</title>
		<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>MYDD! &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svpow.wordpress.com/?p=471#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>[...] is done to science as long as the follow-up descriptions do eventually appear (sometimes they don&#8217;t). But Calvo et al. (2008) put out a longer description of Futalognkosaurus the very next year, for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is done to science as long as the follow-up descriptions do eventually appear (sometimes they don&#8217;t). But Calvo et al. (2008) put out a longer description of Futalognkosaurus the very next year, for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinosaur Tracking</title>
		<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinosaur Tracking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svpow.wordpress.com/?p=471#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>[...] which specializes on the weird vertebrae of sauropods, paleontologist Matt Wedel wrote a detailed critique of the Aerosteon paper. Beyond debating the anatomical analysis of the new dinosaur, Wedel charged [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which specializes on the weird vertebrae of sauropods, paleontologist Matt Wedel wrote a detailed critique of the Aerosteon paper. Beyond debating the anatomical analysis of the new dinosaur, Wedel charged [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Aerosteon saga, Part 3: True and false ad hominems &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</title>
		<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/#comment-1843</link>
		<dc:creator>The Aerosteon saga, Part 3: True and false ad hominems &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svpow.wordpress.com/?p=471#comment-1843</guid>
		<description>[...] The Aerosteon saga, Part 2: Overinflation and undercitation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Aerosteon saga, Part 2: Overinflation and undercitation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2008-10-13 - Aerosteon Update 2 (Aerosteon riocoloradensis) &#171; PaleonewsITA</title>
		<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>2008-10-13 - Aerosteon Update 2 (Aerosteon riocoloradensis) &#171; PaleonewsITA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svpow.wordpress.com/?p=471#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>[...] The Aerosteon saga, Part 2: Overinflation and undercitation Ottobre 5, 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Aerosteon saga, Part 2: Overinflation and undercitation Ottobre 5, 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A year in sauropod vertebrae &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</title>
		<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>A year in sauropod vertebrae &#171; Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svpow.wordpress.com/?p=471#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>[...] 12, 2008   What with all the fuss over Aerostron, it seems that we missed SV-POW!&#8217;s first birthday. Yes, it&#8217;s been just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 12, 2008   What with all the fuss over Aerostron, it seems that we missed SV-POW!&#8217;s first birthday. Yes, it&#8217;s been just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DD</title>
		<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>DD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svpow.wordpress.com/?p=471#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>one word: superawesomeness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one word: superawesomeness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Taylor</title>
		<link>http://svpow.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/the-aerosteon-saga-part-2-overinflation-and-undercitation/#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svpow.wordpress.com/?p=471#comment-1626</guid>
		<description>Andy, I think that&#039;s very unusual in palaeo.  I only know of one paper whose reviews have been published, and that&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.miketaylor.org.uk/dino/danny/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, I think that&#8217;s very unusual in palaeo.  I only know of one paper whose reviews have been published, and that&#8217;s <a href="http://www.miketaylor.org.uk/dino/danny/" rel="nofollow">this one</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
